The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently released an official memorandum that significantly tightens the criteria for adjusting immigration status within the country. Now, this process is reserved for only "extraordinary circumstances," compelling most temporary visa holders to return to their home countries to apply for permanent residency through consular channels.
Immigration attorney Liudmila Marcelo, speaking with Tania Costa for CiberCuba, highlighted the profound impact of this policy. "So many people, so many people. I have clients waiting since last January for us to send their packages for status adjustment," she stated.
The official USCIS announcement clarifies that "non-immigrants such as students, temporary workers, and tourists come to the United States for a brief period and a specific purpose." It emphasizes that the system is designed for them to return home after their visit, not as a stepping stone to obtaining a green card.
This directive directly affects those who entered the U.S. on tourist visas, ESTA authorizations, or other temporary visas and later found a path to adjust their status, such as through marriage to a U.S. citizen or a petition from an adult child. Marcelo noted that Venezuelans with dual Spanish, Portuguese, or Italian citizenship who entered using ESTA and have family in the U.S. are also impacted.
Clarifying the Cuban Adjustment Act
A pressing question within the Cuban community was whether this measure affects the Cuban Adjustment Act. Marcelo assured, "As of now, Tania, the Cuban Adjustment Act, if you're Cuban, enter with ESTA, and wait a year and a day, you're not affected."
However, Marcelo warned of a potential "trap" in the logic, as Costa phrased it during the interview: "The trap is if I can't stay in the U.S. to wait a year and a day, I can never complete the year and a day." Marcelo agreed, stating, "Exactly, that's why I would exclude the Cuban Adjustment Act from the equation altogether because it would prevent fulfilling the law's requirement."
Marcelo was clear on the implications if the directive extended to Cubans: "If they say it affects those pursuing Cuban adjustment, then it's over... tell me that adjustment based on the Cuban Adjustment Act has ended. The essence is not having to return to Cuba to adjust status here."
Legal Challenges Anticipated
Marcelo also clarified that those who have already processed their cases through the consular route from the U.S. Embassy in Havana and entered with immigrant visas are not affected, having completed the necessary processes before entering the country.
Regarding the legality of the measure, Marcelo criticized the approach: "They are analyzing the law incorrectly, leading me to believe that, as always, there will be lawsuits. These lawsuits will likely favor us because the law is being misinterpreted, as has been the case since this administration began."
This directive adds to a series of immigration restrictions impacting Cuban residency processes since the Trump administration, including halting humanitarian parole applications and suspending immigrant visa processing for 75 countries, including Cuba, effective January 21, 2026.
The memorandum lacks a specified effective date, creating further uncertainty about whether the measure applies to already submitted applications, Marcelo warned during the interview.
Understanding the Recent Changes in U.S. Immigration Policy
Who is most affected by the new USCIS directive?
The directive primarily affects those on temporary visas, such as tourists, students, and temporary workers, who are seeking to adjust their status without leaving the United States.
Does the new policy impact the Cuban Adjustment Act?
According to Attorney Liudmila Marcelo, the Cuban Adjustment Act is not currently affected, as long as the individual remains in the U.S. for a year and a day after entering with ESTA.
What legal challenges could arise from this new memorandum?
Marcelo anticipates legal challenges because the directive may be interpreting immigration law incorrectly, which could result in lawsuits that favor those affected by the policy.