The recent announcement by Lis Cuesta regarding musician Israel Rojas, leader of the band Buena Fe, joining a classroom at the Higher Institute of Art (ISA) has sparked widespread criticism on social media. The cultural official and wife of Cuban leader Miguel Díaz-Canel posted on X that Rojas would be participating in an academic space focusing on Cultural Industries. She described the event as "happy and productive," and asserted that the Management career would be "honored by creators who break barriers."
However, Cuesta's attempt to position Rojas as a key figure in dialogues with Cuban students and creators is being viewed as more of a manipulative tactic than a genuine opening. Her announcement comes shortly after Rojas appeared on the YouTube channel La Joven Cuba, where he discussed possible pardons for July 11th prisoners and national reconciliation, notably avoiding any mention of the regime's repression, censorship, or violence.
Israel Rojas, previously known for his alignment with the Cuban government, has actively defended the regime, denied the existence of political prisoners, and discredited citizen protests. His recent shift in discourse during the interview was met with skepticism. To many Cubans, this doesn't signify a genuine transformation but rather an attempt to reposition himself without severing ties with power.
The social media reaction was swift and harsh. "The Cuban people are dying of hunger and misery, and they're talking about happiness and debates at the ISA," criticized one user. Another added, "They should be ashamed of how they've left the people. They should leave before they're held accountable for their crimes."
Further comments highlighted the evident manipulation: "They're sinking, just watch," while others described Lis's proposal to Israel as nothing more than "a circus." Far from enhancing dialogue between Cuban creators and university students, Cuesta's initiative is perceived as an operation to recycle a worn-out official figure, using him as a symbolic bridge without allowing real questioning of the system.
Meanwhile, artists who dare to dissent face exile, censorship, or institutional silence. Cuesta, a prominent public figure, once again emerges as a key spokesperson for the Castro regime's cultural agenda. Her management seems more focused on propaganda than on engaging in critical dialogue about the country's reality.
The maneuver with Rojas highlights the regime's intent to shield its official discourse while trying to maintain control over figures who can still influence critical sectors, especially among young university students. The Cuban public's response on social media made it clear that no amount of spin can cover up the unraveling of Miguel Díaz-Canel's government. The communist forces are increasingly weak and fractured, despite efforts to project strength.
Cuban Public Reaction and Israel Rojas's Role
What was the public reaction to Lis Cuesta's announcement?
The public reaction was overwhelmingly critical, with many expressing indignation over the perceived manipulation and the stark contrast between the regime's narrative and the reality faced by the Cuban people.
Why is Israel Rojas's involvement controversial?
Israel Rojas's involvement is controversial because he has been a vocal supporter of the Cuban government, denying political repression, and his recent statements are seen as an attempt to reposition himself without truly addressing the regime's issues.
How does Lis Cuesta fit into the Cuban cultural agenda?
Lis Cuesta is a prominent figure in promoting the Cuban cultural agenda, often focusing on propaganda rather than engaging in genuine critical dialogue about the issues facing the country.