The Federación Estudiantil Universitaria (FEU) in Cuba, which initially spoke out against ETECSA's so-called Tarifazo, announced that it participated in a meeting this Sunday with the telecommunications company’s leadership, alongside the Communist Party of Cuba, the Unión de Jóvenes Comunistas (UJC), the Revolutionary Government, various ministerial bodies, and the Federación de Estudiantes de la Enseñanza Media (FEEM). Following this meeting, the FEU shared a conciliatory statement on Facebook, predictably targeting so-called "enemies."
According to the statement, the gathering allowed for a "productive dialogue with meaningful solutions" addressing student concerns regarding the state telecom company's announced rate hikes. The FEU promised that the proposals from this meeting would soon be revealed and condemned what it described as "manipulation by enemies of the Revolution," who they claim have spread fake news and illegitimate calls, thus tarnishing the legitimate debate originating from universities.
"As expected, enemies of the Revolution have distorted the student meeting spaces and debates. Our concerns about ETECSA's decisions, within the mature and revolutionary exchanges encouraged by our institutions, are being addressed as we have rightfully demanded. The FEU has a legitimate space for expression, consecrated by its history and our Revolution," the statement concluded.
Backlash: Distrust and Accusations of Opportunism
The statement quickly drew heated reactions on social media, mostly critical. Many questioned the FEU's actual autonomy, its representativeness, and the tangible outcomes of its dialogue with ETECSA.
"The national FEU, as the political arm of the Communist Party, distances itself from protest calls, labeling them as 'fake news' and manipulation. We were never fooled; these satellite organizations neither respond to nor represent the students... we must continue," activist Jorge Mag Castro posted on X.
In the comments section of the FEU's Facebook post, numerous users expressed outrage over the FEU's reversal, invoking the spirit of historical figures such as Mella and Julio Antonio Echeverría. "The voice of university students should resonate for the entire nation. Like Mella, José Antonio, and many others, do not let the people down!" urged one commenter.
Others accused the FEU of political opportunism, suggesting it would do anything to protect its privileges. "The national FEU are 'political figures.' They'll protect their benefits at all costs. I hope the student body takes note," expressed a disappointed commenter.
Broader Demands and Criticism of Selective Dialogue
Some users pointed out that the issue is not limited to the student sector and criticized the preferential dialogue with a fraction of the population while the rest of the country faces blackouts, inflation, and limited access to basic services.
"This isn't just about students. What about doctors, engineers, workers? Internet access is a necessity, not a luxury," and "They shouldn't just think about FEU students; they should consider the entire country affected," were other sentiments shared.
Accusations of simulation and institutional discredit were rampant, with many directly accusing the FEU of acting as a political tool for the UJC, lacking true student autonomy. The statement was seen as an attempt to quell popular pressure and subdue more genuine student protests emerging in various faculties.
Critics argued, "Have they solved anything? They're a decadent and shameful organization for Cuban youth," and "The FEU leadership doesn't represent students at all. They are puppets," further illustrating the discontent.
Demands for Broader Solutions and Conclusion of the Debate
While a minority supported the institutional dialogue, the overwhelming demand was for real representation, transparency in decision-making, and comprehensive solutions for the entire Cuban society.
Calls for broader solutions included, "Propose solutions for retirees and pensioners too. They can't afford more megabytes on 1700 pesos," and "The solution must be equal for all people." The FEU's statement has reignited distrust toward Cuban student organizations, with many accusing them of being political extensions rather than genuine student representatives.
Far from calming tensions, the statement has sparked a wide and deep debate revealing the frustration, critical awareness, and need for real changes in Cuba. Miguel Díaz-Canel, after his criticized reaction to the measure, announced on X that the topic of ETECSA's new rates would be discussed on his podcast "From the Presidency."
Meanwhile, the executive president of the Empresa de Telecomunicaciones de Cuba (ETECSA), Tania Velázquez Rodríguez, announced a new appearance on the Mesa Redonda scheduled for this Monday to address the company's recent measures. The decision to limit national currency balances in favor of foreign exchange usage has drawn widespread criticism on social media and negative public opinion across the country, prompting ETECSA's management to appear on national television last Saturday.
Common Questions about FEU's Recent Actions and ETECSA's Rate Hikes
What was the FEU's initial stance on ETECSA's Tarifazo?
The FEU initially opposed ETECSA's Tarifazo, voicing concerns about the impact of increased rates on students.
Why did the FEU change its position after meeting with ETECSA?
After meeting with ETECSA and other governmental bodies, the FEU praised the dialogue as productive, claiming it yielded important solutions for student concerns.
How has the public reacted to the FEU's statement?
The public response has been largely critical, with many questioning the FEU's autonomy, representativeness, and the effectiveness of its dialogue with ETECSA.
What broader issues have been raised in the debate about ETECSA's rate hikes?
The debate has highlighted issues of internet access as a necessity, not a luxury, and the need for equitable solutions for all sectors of Cuban society, not just students.